This page looks plain and unstyled because you're using a non-standard compliant browser. To see it in its best form, please upgrade to a browser that supports web standards. It's free and painless.
| « | November 2008 | » | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Su | Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa |
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | ||||||
Genetic Information
Realizing the Promise of Arbitration
Amendments to the FMLA
SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS IN PAY DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS
Six Things to Look for In Your Next Employment Contract
Michigan Codifies Garrity Rights for Law Enforcement Officers
Clarification of Garg and Evidence of Discrimination Occurring Outside the Statute of Limitations
Sixth Circuit Encourages En Banc Review of Arbitration Timeliness Disputes
Prescription Contraceptives
Michigan Minimum Wage Law
« |
Significant changes to federal regulations governing overtime for “white-collar” employees raise risks, opportunities and human resources issues for employers.
Sweeping changes to these regulations went into effect in August 2004, and to date, attempts in Congress to nullify those regulations by adopting new legislation have failed. Given the re-election of President Bush and control of both houses of Congress by the Republican Party, any change to the new regulations is unlikely. Therefore, managers must become conversant in these changes in order to ensure that their organizations comply with law.
August 2008
April 2008
June 2007
May 2007
March 2007
December 2006
November 2006
August 2006
April 2006
Labor Law [3]

Employment Law [13]

TO OUR SHS Website
SHS HOME
PRACTICE AREAS
OUR ATTORNEYS
CONTACT INFORMATION